Is StumbleUpon Good Social Technology

You may recall or may want to look at my post on Good and Bad Social Technology, where having defined social technology as the study, collection and application of tools a person can use to improve their social environment, I went on to write about good social technology, which not only improves the individual’s social environment but is good for the world as a whole, and bad social technology, the opposite, which is bad for the world as a whole.   Considering the global social environment, it can be polluted, harmed by the selfish actions of individuals trying only to improve their own situation.

Elsewhere I have suggested that Facebook is bad social technology in this sense, in that it is actually harmful to society.  I am not talking about privacy and security issues, I am talking about its effect on the social network.  Rather than drawing together people who are genuinely compatible, it makes it too easy to waste time with links that will confuse, distort or not propagate your attempts to pull together network of enjoyable and useful connections.

I am trying to decide for myself whether StumbleUpon might be called good social technology.  It seems to me that it might serve to connect strangers who do indeed have common interests, thus pulling together distant people who truly have something in common together, without requiring them to join discussion groups of dubious value.  Since people have only a finite amount of time, finding good connections this way might weaken connections which are not either useful enjoyable.

I have not made up my mind about this, but it is work exploring.  While thinking about it, I do, of course, actually use StumbleUpon, which is a lot of fun.  — dpw

This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply